Wall Street Journal: How Performance Reviews Can Harm Mental Health

wsj

Big companies are starting to rethink how they do performance reviews. And that might do a lot to help their employees’ mental health. In recent years, giants like Microsoft Corp. and Eli Lilly & Co. have dropped the standard model of performance reviews where an employee meets with a manager once a year and gets a grade. They’re moving toward setups where bosses and workers have frequent, low-pressure conversations about performance and expectations, and they’re ditching grades in favor of more nuanced ways to judge performance. A deep effect Companies have been debating and tinkering with performance reviews for a long time. Now, though, there’s science to back up the changes they’re making. In a 2014 paper in the journal Strategy + Business, David Rock, Josh Davis and Beth Jones, all researchers at the Neuroleadership Institute, concluded that the very act of giving employees a rating jolts them into a “fight or flight” scenario—”the same type of ‘brain hijack’ that occurs when there is an imminent physical threat like a confrontation…”

Read more…

2017-08-31T08:21:13+00:00
Register for next members-only briefing on "The Neuroscience of Effective Teams " Tuesday, January 22nd, 12:30pm EST Register